ROBERT ARTHUR MENARD Disassociated from Canada by B.C. Supreme Court

ROBERT ARTHUR MENARD
( the corporate fiction created by fiction)

Disassociated from Canada by
B.C. Supreme Court

A first: Man been “disassociated” from Canada by the Supreme Court of B.C., – not a ‘terrorist’, still a free man, just no longer allowed to “legally” defend himself in their courts, have access to due process or make claim for damages in commerce for himself or anyone else

A man who goes by the name Robert-Arthur: Menard, creator of ThinkFree and a strong freedom and human rights supporter, who the Supreme Court of British Columbia refers to as “Robert Arthur Menard of North Vancouver”, has been prohibited from appearing in their courts and having due process, in addition to preparing documents for others present in court and even operating normally in everyday commercial transactions.

This occurred as he has fallen out of “good standing”

with the Law Society of British Columbia after previously successfully challenging their assumed lawful authority.

They have decided, without due process,

that he is prohibited from…

(a) appearing as counsel or advocate;

(b) drawing, revising or settling a document for use

in a proceeding judicial or extra-judicial;

(c) drawing, revising or settling a will,

deed of settlement, trust deed, …;

(d) drawing, revising or settling a document

relating in any way to proceedings
under a statute of Canada or British Columbia;

(e) doing any act or negotiation in any way

for the settlement of,or settling,

a claim or demand for damages;

etc.

…effectively barring him from operation in society,
including the proper use of commerce;
the right to a claim or demand for damages regarding
the use of commercial instruments,
legal tender and accounts,

and with utility companies and other businesses

for simple services in everyday commerce.

This move is a first by the Supreme Court and
the Law Society for any man in Canada

and has surprised other supporters of freedom

and human rights who have questioned how
the Law Society can make such claims

to disassociate a man from society.

He is barred from challenging it, even though he has

only just found out about the order,

and he is barred from preparing

the documents for my his own challenge.

He has not found to have done

any thing unlawful, only to have fallen

out of “good standing”.

The Order stands “until such time as he becomes a member in good standing of the Law Society of British Columbia”.
[THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER REGISTRY NO. S073719]

Origins of dispute

The source of the contention can be traced back to 2000 when a child under his care was tried to be seized by the de-facto “authority” supported by the Law Society. Robert-Arthur: Menard made counterclaim at law and finally received justice but the Law Society continued to pursue matters against Robert-Arthur after he taught others how to receive justice in courts of record.

Robert-Arthur wrote in Nov. 2004…

I have spent many hours in the last four years in extensive study of the Law and I am now using that information to benefit my fellow man and help create a freer and more just society. Those of you who know me already are likely aware that I am motivated by my love for one Elizabeth Anne Elaine who four years ago was abducted under the colour of Law and by the MCFCD. I am also guided for my compassion for my fellow man and realise that I have a duty to treat all with dignity and respect. I love this Nation and the concepts upon which it is founded and believe that with my actions I am strengthening the best parts of it, while pruning the worst.